For a Lasting Peace in Mindanao (Part II)
by Sixto Domogen
Benguet State University
In conclusion, the years of war has not only
affected the Moro settlers but also Christians who live within the region. Many
of them have not been able to maintain their businesses due to the unresolved conflict. Ending the years of war by granting the Bangsamoro right to self-government can lead to the flourishing
economic activity and the further development in the region. This will be to the
advantage not only to the Moros, or the Christians settlers in Mindanao, but
also of the Filipino nation as a whole.
Benguet State University
The country’s Muslims …also
became victims of government policies, especially over the use of land and
resources. For instance, the Philippine Commission Act of 1903 declared null
and void all land grants made by traditional leaders without the consent of the
Government. All of Mindanao was opened to
resettlement programs of homesteaders and the entry of corporations, a
discriminatory Public Land Law was likewise implemented which favored
homesteaders and corporations.
The Moro aspiration for
independence has been articulated since the early 1900s through the various
letters by the Moro Datus to the US Government, and there were at least three
letters of the Datus to the US Government:
1. (1924) The letter of some Moro leaders toUS Congress proposed
that Mindanao, Sulu archipelago and Palawan be made into an unorganized territory of the USA ;
and that a plebiscite be held 50 years after Philippine independence, for Moros
to decide whether to be part of the Philippines or be an independent
state.
2. (1935) The letter of some Moro leaders to US President which states: “We do not want to be included in the Philippine independence; once an independent Philippines is launched, troubles (will erupt) between us and the Christian Filipinos because from time immemorial these two people have not lived harmoniously.
3. (1961) The Bill filed by Congressman Ombra Amilbangsa – granted and recognized the independence of theprovince of Sulu .
1. (1924) The letter of some Moro leaders to
2. (1935) The letter of some Moro leaders to US President which states: “We do not want to be included in the Philippine independence; once an independent Philippines is launched, troubles (will erupt) between us and the Christian Filipinos because from time immemorial these two people have not lived harmoniously.
3. (1961) The Bill filed by Congressman Ombra Amilbangsa – granted and recognized the independence of the
In 1986, the Muslim Independence
Movement (MIM) was formed with the aim of establishing an Islamic state of
Cotabato, Davao, Zamboanga and Zamboanga City, Lanao, Sulu and Palawan, and the
adjoining Muslim areas, including maritime areas therein. The hostilities
between the Government and the Moros actually
began in the 1970s between Government forces and the Moro National Liberation Front
(MNLF) – the first Moro revolutionary group.
Sometime in 1977, a faction of
MNLF splintered and formed the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). A final
peace settlement with the MNLF was reached in 1996 under the concept of
autonomy prescribed by the Tripoli Agreement of 1976. (Imelda Marcos was the
prime mediator in behalf of RP with Khadapi of Libya acting as moderator
between RP and MNLF, parenthetical comment mine) Meanwhile, peace negotiations
with the MILF had been ongoing since 1997, and the talks hinge on the question
of "how to solve the Bangsamoro problem."
The Mindanao conflict did not start from within.
In other words, such misunderstanding and conflict did not come from the Moros but it can be traced to the invading colonizers. They divided and destroyed the unity of the Moros. The
Spaniards called/portrayed the Moro people as illiterate, uncivilized and
violent. (Alim 1995)
The Mindanao conflict is a
multi-complex issue. It has been a conflict that started four decades ago and will continue
to exist if the national government will remain naive to the lack of freedom in the region in terms of people's rights to self-determination and the equitable distribution of resources. Yet, all sectors, organizations (private and public) must contribute something for the
realization of a lasting peace in Mindanao.
As Bautista puts it, “The Moros
are victims of social and political alienation. Their social political
alienation in their own homeland is the direct and logical result of their
economic alienation brought about by the forcible expropriation of their
ancestral lands sanctioned by the Philippine Government to favor the Christian
settlers and big corporations. The ultimate solution to their economic, social,
and political alienation of the Moros appears to be the re-acquisition of their
ancestral domain – the ultimate ground of their sovereignty and
self-determination as separate people within the Republic."