Radical Democracy in the Time of Duterte

-

Radical Democracy in the Time of Duterte is a 2022 book by Christopher Ryan Maboloc (published by ElziStyle Bookshop, Cotabato City, with a foreword by Wataru Kusaka). 

It is a collection of essays (comprising ten chapters) that the author developed over five years, chronicling and analyzing the six-year presidency of Philippine President Rodrigo Roa Duterte (2016–2022). 

The book draws heavily on postmodern and post-Marxist political theory—particularly the concept of radical democracy as articulated by Belgian philosopher Chantal Mouffe—to frame Duterte's leadership style and policies.

Core Thesis and Framework

Maboloc argues that Duterte's approach represents a form of radical democracy in the Philippine context. Drawing from Mouffe's ideas, he portrays radical democracy as embracing:

The permanence of conflict and antagonism in politics (rejecting illusions of perfect consensus or a harmonious collective will).

The rejection of a homogeneous society or elite-driven liberal consensus.

The role of passion, resistance, and agonistic (adversarial) engagement over purely rational deliberation.

In this lens, Duterte's presidency is not merely authoritarian (as critics often claim) but a radical response to the deep structural failures, colonial legacies, and elitist liberal democracy in the Philippines. Maboloc traces these roots to historical grievances—especially in Mindanao (Duterte's home region), where people felt betrayed by Manila-centric elites—and positions Duterte as the first Mindanawon president embodying a challenge to traditional liberal interpretations of Philippine politics.

The book uses a postmodern perspective to provide what the author describes as a "clinical assessment" of Duterte's rule, justifying "radical means" to address longstanding inequalities, oligarchic control, and systemic issues.

Key Topics Covered

The essays examine various facets of the Duterte administration, including:

The war on drugs (its ethical and political dimensions).

Peace efforts in Mindanao (e.g., the Bangsamoro process and addressing historical injustices).

The COVID-19 pandemic response and related public health/structural challenges.

Broader issues like populism, nation-state tensions, resistance to elite dominance, and the clash of historical, philosophical, ethical, and religious forces that shaped Duterte's rise and governance.

Reception and Context

The book is praised for its impassioned, Mindanao-centric analysis and for offering a provocative alternative to mainstream liberal critiques (e.g., reviewed positively in Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture for depicting Duterte's ascent through historical/political/philosophical lenses, with themes of resistance).

It has sparked debate and criticism, particularly around the application of Mouffe's theory to Duterte (some scholars argue it misappropriates radical democracy, as Duterte's methods undermined conditions for true agonistic pluralism, e.g., critiques in Kritike and other journals).

It builds on Maboloc's earlier articles (e.g., "Radical Democracy in the Time of Duterte" in Philippine Daily Inquirer, 2016, and related papers on Duterte's radical politics).

Overall, the book serves as both a scholarly defense/justification of Duterte's "progressive" or disruptive politics and a philosophical intervention in Philippine democratic discourse, emphasizing how radical approaches can confront entrenched inequalities—though it remains controversial for its sympathetic framing of a polarizing leader.

Source: xAI (SuperGrok)

Popular posts from this blog

Power and Politics: The Limits of Legality

-
Image
  By Givheart Dano "Let the court decide." These words have been echoing, attempting to balance the tremors of today's issue regarding Duterte’s arrest. Legal minds have tried to justify this, yet their opinions remain divided, it all comes down to how they interpret the law. However, the truth about Duterte’s fate in the face of justice has yet to be determined, as the ICC has not yet rendered its judgment. The ICC claims to be the entity that will bring justice for crimes committed in his own country. But one may ask: why outside his own land? Of course, returning to the legal perspective, the ICC still has jurisdiction despite the Philippines’ withdrawal from the court during Duterte’s presidency. This withdrawal does not strip the ICC of its jurisdiction, as cases were already filed before the withdrawal took effect, allowing the ICC to retain its authority. However, even among the judges in The Hague (ICC), opinions are divided on the question of jurisdiction, which ...
Read more

The Different Types of Filipino Masses: From EDSA to Duterte

-
Image
  By Oliver Perater  Former President Duterte and Former President Marcos Sr. have something in common, both awakened the Sleeping Political Consciousness of the Filipino Masses. The former, however, made the masses rally behind his back while the latter made the masses rally against him. The Edsa People Power masses were driven by pure disgust for the former president Marcos. It was merely a phenomenon to remove him and his cronies without offering a better replacement. At that time, people seemed willing to allow anyone to lead the country except Marcos and his allies. In fact, it was a chance for the Communist Party of the Philippines to seize political power, but they failed to listen to the sentiments of the masses. People were never as involved in elections as when Duterte started to participate in national politics. Actively supporting a politician without being paid is a new phenomenon. Filipino participation in elections before Duterte was not as personal as it is now...
Read more

So, who is the better thinker?

-
Image
  By Menelito Mansueto I am tempted to say that some Manila-based scholars have a biased view against a leader like Duterte. But I have personally known a few who are supportive of the former President. I prefer to believe that some people are in what is called an echo chamber. Most critics of Duterte have either a left-leaning bias or a Catholic faith-centered bias. Journalists who believe in their fellow journalists’ views are also the ones who tend to critique the Dutertes. Ironically, they also believe in fabricated lies and biases. What is even more ironic is that those who tend to shut down other people’s opinions concerning their political choices claim to be a proponent of democracy. Yet, they could not tolerate opinions that are different from theirs. They have become egotistically self-centered, like Protagoras, thinking they are the measure of all things. Or perhaps their metropolitan position has given them the guts to feel like they are at the center of the world. Dute...
Read more