Posts

Deconstructing the False Dilemma of Vice President Sara Duterte’s Impeachment (Part 2)

-
Image
  By Francis Jeus Ibañez  Justice as Ethical Governance, Not Political Theater Justice in the Philippines must be more than a punitive reaction—it must be a sustained ethical and political commitment. And in this light, Vice President Duterte represents something often absent in today’s polarized leadership landscape: constitutional restraint coupled with administrative discipline. Her track record is not mere political decoration: A legal education that informs her approach to governance Executive experience as Davao City mayor marked by firm, lawful administration A leadership style that favors rule-based action over populist theatrics This is not to say she is beyond scrutiny. No public official is. But to turn her into the central villain in a moral drama robs the public of more pressing institutional reforms and buries the real questions about how to rebuild trust in governance. If justice is to have any lasting impact, it must be seen not only in the removal of perceived...
Read more

Deconstructing the False Dilemma of Vice President Sara Duterte’s Impeachment (Part I)

-
Image
  By Francis Jeus Ibañez Why Justice in the Philippines Demands More Than Political Spectacle In recent months, a wave of calls for the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte has swept through political conversations, media reports, and social platforms. With each trending hashtag and televised interview, the public is increasingly being presented with a deceptive choice: either impeach Sara Duterte or accept the death of justice in the Philippines. But this binary framing is not only misleading—it is intellectually dishonest, democratically immature, and constitutionally dangerous. What we are witnessing is not a movement for justice, but a political spectacle wrapped in the rhetoric of accountability. It is time to deconstruct this false dilemma, expose the pitfalls of such reductionist thinking, and reclaim the broader, deeper pursuit of ethical governance.  Beyond Binary Thinking: The Myth of “Impeach or Perish” Philippine society has long been vulnerable to binary nar...
Read more

Naturalism and Positivism: The Turmoil of the South on the Unconstitutionality of Sara’s Impeachment

-
Image
  By Givheart Carmelo Dano  Politics as usual. The phrase says it all about what is happening in the country today. The South is in turmoil over the Supreme Court’s decision surrounding Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment case. The final arbiter unanimously decided on the unconstitutionality of the charges in favor of VP Sara. Indeed  her critics are not happy.  However, Mr. Richard Heydarian, a fierce critic, again fell short in his analysis. UP people and retired justices argued that the SC is wrong in its unanimous decision. Akbayan Party-list Rep. Perci Cendaña labeled the SC as the “Supreme Coddler.” Coddler, according to the Cambridge Dictionary, means a person who protects someone too much or treats them too kindly. But the decision of the SC is none of the descriptions of what some critics are barking about. What the SC did was founded on the principles of natural and positive law. First, natural law emphasizes that law is grounded in universal principl...
Read more

The Rule of Law

-
Image
  By Francis Jeus Ibañez  The rule of law must be both respected and feared, for only through its uncompromising authority can justice prevail and truth emerge with clarity. Those who seek to tamper with its sanctity must reckon with inevitable accountability, as the time approaches when the Supreme Court—our ultimate arbiter—must act to restrain, if not eliminate, those who manipulate the legal order. Dr. Christopher Ryan Maboloc explains: "In the Upanishads, it is stated that the law is the king of kings, which means that it is higher than the king. The concept of the rule of law means that "no one is above the law" or that "all are equal before the law". This was clearly stated in the Magna Carta, written in the 12th century. In fact, the concept, which is the spirit behind every constitutional democracy, is a reaction to the divine rights theory.  The rule of law hence defines the essence of a democratic government. Maboloc adds that for Plato, if the law i...
Read more

WAR

-
Image
  By Christopher Ryan Maboloc, PhD  US President Donald Trump ordered his B2 Stealth bombers to drop 30k lbs GBU57 bunker busters in three Iranian nuclear facilities - Fordo, Natanz, and Esfahan. No person was happier than Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, whom Trump mentioned in his speech, "Peace through strength," Netanyahu said. The US President was telling Iran to surrender, or in short, abandon its nuclear enrichment program, warning the regime of the risk of more action. Iran was quick in its retort, saying there's no damage to its nuclear ambitions because much of the materials have already been evacuated. Analysts say that the action of the US will not stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons. In fact, Trump is giving Iran more reasons to find the means to arm itself with the most destructive weapon known to man, asserting its right to protect itself against all forms of aggression in the future. If anything, this will only cause a pause in its nuclear program. In ...
Read more

From Silencing to Struggle

-
Image
by Evan Larona  The Senate just sent the impeachment case against VP Sara Duterte back to the House. Some see it as procedural, but make no mistake, this was a political defeat for those trying to erase her from the ballot in the 2028 Presidential elections. The frustration is clear in the face of Senator Risa Hontiveros and rightly so.  Let’s be real, this wasn’t about justice but power. While big issues like the GAA anomalies, PhilHealth mess, the ayuda lifestyle, and even the questionable detention of former President Rodrigo Duterte remain untouched, the system tried to punish one political figure who stood in the way. But this move backfired. Now that the impeachment drama is over, will we see the same moral urgency from civil society, institutions, and “rule of law” defenders when it comes to these real national concerns? Or do moral arguments only apply when it’s politically convenient? However you look at it, the cause of the progressive liberals appears defeated....
Read more

Selective Outrage is not Justice

-
Image
  By Evan Larona  When corruption stares us in the face. From GAA insertions, the Ayuda lifestyle, to the PhilHealth mess, where was the outrage? Why is it that the cry for the “rule of law” becomes loud only when it’s politically convenient? Justice is not a weapon. It is a principle. And when we invoke it only when it serves our biases, we don’t uphold the law.. we are mocking it. As Carl Schmitt rightly pointed out, the political arises from the friend-enemy distinction, and that is exactly what we’re witnessing. What we’re seeing isn’t just a legal process; it’s a clash of identities, power, and long-standing regional exclusion. We need to stop pretending that political struggles are merely legal disputes, They are not. They are clashes of identity. They are contests of power. They are rooted in the historical exclusion of Mindanao and the Bisaya from the circles of national decision-making. This isn't just about constitutional duties, it's about who gets to shape the nati...
Read more